Built for change.
Designed for stability.
.avif)
The principles behind RocketRide.
01
Model Agnostic
Use the best model for every task without changing your application.
02
Provider Agnostic
Move between OpenAI, Anthropic, Google or any future provider with minimal friction.
03
Tool Agnostic
Integrate the tools, frameworks and databases that fit your workflow.
04
Built for Production
From prototype to deployment, every workflow is designed for real-world applications.
05
Full Observability
Understand what’s happening across every pipeline, model call and deployment.
05
Open by Design
No vendor lock-in. No hidden dependencies. Full control over your stack.
Infrastructure should be boring.
The interesting problem is what you are building, not the connectors, queues, and stage wiring underneath. We make the boring parts boring so you can focus on the interesting parts.
Scalability is not a phase two concern.
Single-threaded code that works in a demo and dies under real load wastes everyone’s time. Concurrency and backpressure belong in the foundation, not in a future refactor.
Open roadmap, open discourse.
Features should be shaped by developers who actually use the tool in production, not by a product team with a quarterly release schedule. That only works in public.
Vendor lock-in is a design flaw.
You should be able to swap models, switch storage layers, and move to a different cloud without rewriting your pipeline. That is why everything here is modular by default.
Where the project
actually lives.
The RocketRide community is developers who are building real applications and agentic workflows in VSCode and Cursor.
Most conversations happen on Discord, most decisions happen in GitHub issues, and most patterns get documented through conference talks and community write-ups.
We present at open source conferences and developer meetups — not to market, but to get feedback from the people who push these patterns hardest.
If you are building at that level, we want to hear how it goes.
Most conversations happen on Discord, most decisions happen in GitHub issues, and most patterns get documented through conference talks and community write-ups.
We present at open source conferences and developer meetups — not to market, but to get feedback from the people who push these patterns hardest.
If you are building at that level, we want to hear how it goes.
01
File real issues
Use it on a real pipeline, find what breaks, and write it up with a reproduction. That is the most useful contribution there is.
02
Contribute a connector or pattern
If you built a custom integration for a model or data source, open a PR. Every pre-built connector is one less thing agents will rewrite.
03
Share what you shipped
Real production architectures and lessons learned are the best documentation the project has. Discord is where those conversations happen.








